Although I have heard about this editorial malpractice for many years, it was only about half a decade ago that I knew that there is a word for it: grangerize.
grangerize: to mutilate books, especially by cutting out their illustrations.
Grangerism is the pernicious vice of cutting plates and title-pages out of many books to illustrate one book.
Although grangerism is not officially condoned in most publishing quarters, however, there had been instances where local ethically challenged editors (who are today disturbingly occupying managerial positions in their respective organizations) probably resorted to this quick-and-dirty technique for one or two of the following reasons:
1. The book from which the picture was cut off was out of print.
2. The copyrights for the illustrations cost exorbitantly.
3. The copyrights holder couldn’t be contacted.
4. The copyrights owner might be in “heaven” (or “hell”).
5. The deadline for the project was just days or hours away.
6. The editor believed she wouldn’t get caught.
7. The project director kept mum about the practice.
8. The budget for illustrations had busted.
9. The available title was a photocopy of photocopies.
10. The editor planned to leave after the submission of the manuscript to the Singapore’s Ministry of Education (MOE) for approval.
11. The editor wanted to get even with her mean publisher.
12. The copyrights process (or clearance) would be delayed until the MOE granted a provisional approval (PA) for the submitted manuscript.
13. The editor’s dog ate the copyrights page.
14. The copyrights owner couldn’t be Googled.
15. The editor scapegoated the Middle East war!
16. The word doctor had little faith in the book being reviewed.
17. The editor anticipated an unavoidable merger prior to any MOE approval.
18. The senior editor crystal-balled that the title would be axed by the MOE.
19. The copyright holder was rude towards the editor.
20. The copyrights officer-in-charge had recently resigned.
21. The grey publisher belittled or offended the green editor.
22. The editor was simply disillusioned about her monotonous editorial life.
23. The copyright owner was spotted with the editor’s lover.
24. The rich editor secretly desired to be fined or jailed.
Let’s not grangerize, unless we don’t mind becoming “editorial gangsters,” not matter how high the temptation, or how low the risk, is.
© Yan Kow Cheong, June 28, 2014.
A motivating discussion is definitely worth comment. There’s no doubt that
that you ought to write more about this topic,
it may not be a taboo subject but usually people do not talk about such issues.
To the next! Cheers!!
Visit my web-site; phen375 weight loss
What i don’t understood is actually how you’re now not actually a lot more
smartly-liked than you may be right now. You’re so intelligent.
You realize thus considerably in terms of this topic, made me for
my part imagine it from so many numerous angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to
be fascinated until it’s something to accomplish with Lady gaga!
Your individual stuffs excellent. All the time take care of it up!
Magnificent website. A lot of useful information here.
I’m sending it to a few buddies ans also sharing in delicious.
And naturally, thank you on your effort!
I was curious if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog?
Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it
better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or two pictures.
Maybe you could space it out better?
I want to tell you that I’m using this site for a long time
and you post good info. I shared your neqset ost
on tumblr and got a loot of positive feedbacks.
Hope you put neew content soon.